When a marriage ends, couples often think first about who will keep the house, who will take the car, or how to split savings accounts. Yet, some of the most valuable (and complicated) assets tend to be the ones people overlook until later: retirement accounts.
Retirement savings represent years of hard work and careful planning. They can also be among the most difficult assets to untangle in a divorce. Unlike a checking account, where the balance is clear, dividing retirement accounts in divorce carries layers of rules, tax implications, and long-term consequences. A misstep in handling them can cost tens of thousands of dollars down the road.
Think about this: the average 401(k) balance for Americans in their 50s is roughly $212,400. For some households, that’s more valuable than the equity in their home. A pension, if one spouse has it, may represent even more—sometimes several thousand dollars per month in future income.
Because retirement accounts are designed to grow over decades, decisions made during divorce negotiations can ripple far into the future. Whether someone plans to retire at 60, 65, or 70, losing a significant portion of retirement savings (or not receiving what you’re legally entitled to) can reshape the rest of a person’s financial life.
How retirement accounts are divided depends heavily on where you live. California, for example, is a community property state. That generally means assets earned or acquired during the marriage, including retirement contributions, are presumed to be split 50/50.
Stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) add another layer of complexity. For example, if an engineer was granted stock options in 2018 and the couple separated in 2022, any shares that vested before separation would typically be treated as community property. Shares vesting after separation may be partly community and partly separate, depending on when they were granted and whether they were meant to reward past service or future performance. Courts often apply specific formulas, such as the Hug or Nelson approach, to make these calculations, and professional valuation is usually required.
We’ll help you divide retirement accounts the right way—protecting your future and avoiding costly mistakes.
Not all retirement savings are handled the same way in a California divorce. Each type of account has its own rules for division, and getting them wrong can lead to taxes, penalties, or long-running disputes:
401(k) and other employer-sponsored plans: Dividing these usually requires a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). This is a court-approved order that instructs the plan administrator on exactly how the funds should be divided. Without a QDRO, transferring money out of the account could trigger taxes and early withdrawal penalties.
IRAs: IRAs don’t require a QDRO, but the transfer still has to be handled carefully. The correct approach is usually a “transfer incident to divorce” or a trustee-to-trustee transfer. If a spouse withdraws funds and hands them over, the IRS treats it as a taxable distribution, and the person taking the money could be hit with penalties.
Pensions: Pensions are often the most complicated asset to divide. Some provide monthly benefits for life, while others allow lump-sum payouts. In California, courts typically use the time rule to determine what portion of the pension is community property, based on how many years of service fell during the marriage compared to total service years. Public employee pensions like CalPERS or CalSTRS have their own requirements, and in many cases, the plan itself must be formally joined to the divorce as a party before division can be ordered.
Why Timing Matters: A common mistake is assuming that pensions or other retirement accounts can be divided “later, when benefits start.” If retirement benefits aren’t formally addressed in the divorce judgment, they may be treated as omitted assets. That means the issue can resurface years later, often with missing records and costly disputes.
Unlike splitting a savings account, valuing retirement accounts often requires professional help. The “balance” on a statement may not reflect the true after-tax value. A $100,000 traditional IRA is not worth the same as $100,000 in a Roth IRA, because withdrawals from one are taxed and the other isn’t.
During negotiations, spouses sometimes make trade-offs. One may keep a larger share of retirement savings in exchange for giving up interest in the family home. Another might prefer immediate assets, like cash, while the other focuses on long-term growth. These negotiations can be strategic, but only if both parties understand what they’re giving up.
Dividing retirement accounts during a divorce requires careful attention to detail, especially in California where federal rules and administrative requirements can create pitfalls if handled incorrectly. Taking proactive steps, such as securing QDROs for 401(k)s and pensions, arranging trustee-to-trustee transfers for IRAs, and factoring in tax consequences, can help protect your financial future.
At Whiting, Ross, Abel & Campbell, our team of experienced family law attorneys understands that these matters are not purely technical—they directly affect your long-term financial stability. We provide personalized guidance and strategic planning to ensure retirement assets are divided fairly, efficiently, and with an eye toward minimizing unnecessary taxes or penalties.
If you’re navigating a divorce involving retirement accounts, our team is here to guide you. With access to trusted financial and tax professionals, we help you make informed decisions that safeguard your future. Contact us today to secure expert support and clarity throughout the process.
The above is not meant to be legal advice, and every case is different. Feel free to reach out to us at Whiting, Ross, Abel & Campbell, LLP if you have any questions. Information contained in this content and website should not be relied on as legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice on your specific situation.
Visiting this site or relying on information gleaned from the site does not create an attorney-client relationship. The content on this website is the property of Whiting, Ross, Abel & Campbell, LLP and may not be used without the written consent thereof.
Retirement accounts earned during the marriage are generally split 50/50 as community property, with division handled through the divorce judgment and proper legal paperwork.
Yes. A QDRO is required to divide a 401(k) or other employer-sponsored plan without triggering taxes or penalties.
You can protect premarital or separately owned retirement accounts by keeping them documented as separate property, using agreements like prenuptials, and carefully managing transfers during divorce.
Dividing a business in divorce in California is rarely straightforward. A company can be both a financial asset and a livelihood, which makes finding a fair solution complicated. Courts and attorneys work to identify what portion of the business is community property, determine its true market value, and decide whether a buyout or division of assets best protects each spouse’s interests.
Divorce often brings financial truths to the surface, and sometimes, those truths reveal a level of deception that goes far beyond marital conflict. When one spouse secretly maintains another residence, hides bank accounts, or manipulates records to conceal income, it’s called financial infidelity. In California, financial infidelity in divorce can lead to serious legal and financial penalties, especially when they violate fiduciary duties or automatic restraining orders (ATROs).
For stay-at-home spouses, divorce isn’t just a legal process — it can feel like stepping into an entirely new world without a safety net. But California law actually provides significant protections for spouses who devoted their time to running a household, raising children, or supporting a partner’s career. Those contributions carry real financial value, and the courts take them seriously when determining support, property division, and custody. Knowing your rights can shift the experience from fear to strategy, giving you a clear path forward even when the future feels uncertain.
The website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be legal advice or the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Portions of this website may include what some states might consider to be attorney advertising. Do not provide any confidential information to Whiting, Ross, Abel & Campbell, LLP through this site. If you need legal advice, you should seek professional assistance from a licensed lawyer in your jurisdiction. Whiting, Ross, Abel & Campbell, LLP is in Walnut Creek, California, and our attorneys are licensed to practice in the State of California.
This privacy notice discloses the privacy practices for Whiting, Ross, Abel & Campbell, LLP relating to information collected on this website.
When you use this website, Whiting, Ross, Abel & Campbell, LLP will collect the personal information you provide to us whether it is by you contacting us by e-mail or otherwise. Whiting, Ross, Abel & Campbell, LLP will not share your information with any third parties. Unless you ask us not to, we may contact you via the contact information you provide to tell you about information regarding the firm or the firm’s practice areas, as well as to tell you about changes to the privacy policy.
If you would not like to be contacted, or if you would like to make changes to the information you provide us through the website, you may contact us directly at 925-296-6000. If there are any material changes to our privacy policy, they will be posted on this website.
This Privacy Policy is effective as of January 1, 2016.